<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Startup Harbor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://startupharbor.me/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://startupharbor.me</link>
	<description>Your local knowledge safe harbor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:52:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Schadenfreude is strong regarding Prenda Law by Tim f.</title>
		<link>http://startupharbor.me/2013/05/07/the-schadenfreude-is-strong-regarding-prenda-law/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim f.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupharbor.me/?p=540#comment-571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, obviously correct. Besides the porno-shame tactic we&#039;re talking the same thing basically.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, obviously correct. Besides the porno-shame tactic we&#8217;re talking the same thing basically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Schadenfreude is strong regarding Prenda Law by Jon</title>
		<link>http://startupharbor.me/2013/05/07/the-schadenfreude-is-strong-regarding-prenda-law/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupharbor.me/?p=540#comment-570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You mean copyright troll, not patent, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean copyright troll, not patent, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Live Blog from Ultra Light Startups by Kim Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://startupharbor.me/2013/03/14/live-blog-from-ultra-light-startups/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim Lloyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 20:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupharbor.me/?p=481#comment-540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is definitely helpful, thanks!  We&#039;re definitely not trying to compete in the curation space.  Our platform will be curation product agnostic, goal is to feed your curation product of choice into our Discovery desk.  We do provide some out-of-the-box curation if desired, but it&#039;s not necessary.  Enjoy your week also!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is definitely helpful, thanks!  We&#8217;re definitely not trying to compete in the curation space.  Our platform will be curation product agnostic, goal is to feed your curation product of choice into our Discovery desk.  We do provide some out-of-the-box curation if desired, but it&#8217;s not necessary.  Enjoy your week also!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Live Blog from Ultra Light Startups by Kim Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://startupharbor.me/2013/03/14/live-blog-from-ultra-light-startups/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim Lloyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 13:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupharbor.me/?p=481#comment-539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great, I have confidence Dan did,  he&#039;s a great spokesperson. Explaining  our value to investors not in the online media and marketing space, has  definitely been our Achilles heel.  So help from anyone reading this  would be much appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, I have confidence Dan did,  he&#8217;s a great spokesperson. Explaining  our value to investors not in the online media and marketing space, has  definitely been our Achilles heel.  So help from anyone reading this  would be much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Live Blog from Ultra Light Startups by Tim f.</title>
		<link>http://startupharbor.me/2013/03/14/live-blog-from-ultra-light-startups/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim f.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 13:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupharbor.me/?p=481#comment-538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kim,
Glad you&#039;re defending and clarifying your brand. I should point out that Dan was well received by the audience and the Sharks joke was pretty funny. These are a combination of my opinions and comments from the panel. Feel free to ignore all of them and tell me I&#039;m wrong. I&#039;m wrong all the time.

Maybe it&#039;s just your intimacy with the space, but the buzz words thing still feels like a problem (and it still feels too long). Forget for a moment what you want to do with the money, get people comfortable on the idea in 2 or 3 sentences. My understanding is probably flawed, but maybe &quot;There&#039;s tons of industry-specific content available already, but we consolidate that and bring our unique content to you (value prop 1). We also have [some mechanism] of creating NEW content that works across all your platforms. Our content creation is different from the tons of other things you see because [here&#039;s why](value prop 2).&quot; Of course you want your ask and what you&#039;re going to do with it, but the whole thing needs to be boiled down and simplified. As for how I&#039;d do it for 2 minutes in Ultra Light pitches? Those things are designed to be damn near impossible. But the discomfort is what makes them good for everyone involved.

Few other comments from the panel that I agreed with. It&#039;s an overly crowded space (Sverve sounded like a competitor too). You seem to be doing multiple things instead of focusing on one. On the news aggregation, there needs to be something more than scraping the web, some proprietary commentary. People in their industries know where to go for news. I go to Hacker News, TechCrunch, PandoDaily. If I want it aggregated, I go to TechMeme. And as for the curators themselves, I heard Dan say there was a 1-8 ratio on curators to clients. That sounds ultimately unmanageable. They also had some commentary on the site itself, seemed cluttered, without examples of what you do. I agreed.  Your biggest plus: you&#039;ve got serious chops in marketing. That&#039;s no small thing.

Hope this is helpful. Happy St. Patrick&#039;s weekend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim,<br />
Glad you&#8217;re defending and clarifying your brand. I should point out that Dan was well received by the audience and the Sharks joke was pretty funny. These are a combination of my opinions and comments from the panel. Feel free to ignore all of them and tell me I&#8217;m wrong. I&#8217;m wrong all the time.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just your intimacy with the space, but the buzz words thing still feels like a problem (and it still feels too long). Forget for a moment what you want to do with the money, get people comfortable on the idea in 2 or 3 sentences. My understanding is probably flawed, but maybe &#8220;There&#8217;s tons of industry-specific content available already, but we consolidate that and bring our unique content to you (value prop 1). We also have [some mechanism] of creating NEW content that works across all your platforms. Our content creation is different from the tons of other things you see because [here's why](value prop 2).&#8221; Of course you want your ask and what you&#8217;re going to do with it, but the whole thing needs to be boiled down and simplified. As for how I&#8217;d do it for 2 minutes in Ultra Light pitches? Those things are designed to be damn near impossible. But the discomfort is what makes them good for everyone involved.</p>
<p>Few other comments from the panel that I agreed with. It&#8217;s an overly crowded space (Sverve sounded like a competitor too). You seem to be doing multiple things instead of focusing on one. On the news aggregation, there needs to be something more than scraping the web, some proprietary commentary. People in their industries know where to go for news. I go to Hacker News, TechCrunch, PandoDaily. If I want it aggregated, I go to TechMeme. And as for the curators themselves, I heard Dan say there was a 1-8 ratio on curators to clients. That sounds ultimately unmanageable. They also had some commentary on the site itself, seemed cluttered, without examples of what you do. I agreed.  Your biggest plus: you&#8217;ve got serious chops in marketing. That&#8217;s no small thing.</p>
<p>Hope this is helpful. Happy St. Patrick&#8217;s weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Live Blog from Ultra Light Startups by Kim Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://startupharbor.me/2013/03/14/live-blog-from-ultra-light-startups/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim Lloyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupharbor.me/?p=481#comment-537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Tim,
Thank you so much for your detailed recap!  I was unable to make it, so my business partner, Dan from Rock the Deadline, had to go solo.  We have been struggling with the 30 second elevator pitch for quite a while now.  So we changed it to &quot;Rock the Deadline solves world peace&quot;

Seriously though, I&#039;d like to try this out on you, please feel free to rip apart:
____________________

Like salesforce.com took managing your sales funnel out of spreadsheets and email, Rock the Deadline is taking the content marketing funnel out of the same ineffective collaboration nightmare.  

What is content marketing?  It is the most effective form of online advertising there is today.  When you read an article, or a blog post, it&#039;s because someone is trying to establish themselves as a thought leader (like you perhaps?).  Thought leadership content is the key to the B2B sales kingdom and our software is the engine.

The pain point is that it&#039;s impossible for B2B marketers to scale this without losing control over quality using outdated and traditional methods.  So they drip it out sporadically and expect it to drive results.  Wrong.  Our Saas is the only complete solution to help companies who want to scale their thought leadership communication.  We give marketers an environment to streamline quality content production (aka feeding their blogs, social media channels, and newsletters) while also providing content experts within their industry to plug in on an as-needed basis.  

We having paying customers already, a version 1 of the SaaS, and have bootstrapped it ourselves and with friends and family money.  We&#039;re looking for 250K to scale market adoption (we can do that in 4 to 6 months) to get the momentum we need to go for a bigger multimillion raise to grow the bejesus out of this thing.

Rock the Deadline Studios is the key to scaling quality content marketing and the answer B2B marketers have been looking for.  

P.S.  Mention this &quot;content marketing&quot; ad and get 20% off your first order :)))
__________________

Does this make it clearer or muddier?  Any advice on  a different angle or approach that would be better understood by someone who isn&#039;t in the deep in the world of marketing would be much appreciated.  Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Tim,<br />
Thank you so much for your detailed recap!  I was unable to make it, so my business partner, Dan from Rock the Deadline, had to go solo.  We have been struggling with the 30 second elevator pitch for quite a while now.  So we changed it to &#8220;Rock the Deadline solves world peace&#8221;</p>
<p>Seriously though, I&#8217;d like to try this out on you, please feel free to rip apart:<br />
____________________</p>
<p>Like salesforce.com took managing your sales funnel out of spreadsheets and email, Rock the Deadline is taking the content marketing funnel out of the same ineffective collaboration nightmare.  </p>
<p>What is content marketing?  It is the most effective form of online advertising there is today.  When you read an article, or a blog post, it&#8217;s because someone is trying to establish themselves as a thought leader (like you perhaps?).  Thought leadership content is the key to the B2B sales kingdom and our software is the engine.</p>
<p>The pain point is that it&#8217;s impossible for B2B marketers to scale this without losing control over quality using outdated and traditional methods.  So they drip it out sporadically and expect it to drive results.  Wrong.  Our Saas is the only complete solution to help companies who want to scale their thought leadership communication.  We give marketers an environment to streamline quality content production (aka feeding their blogs, social media channels, and newsletters) while also providing content experts within their industry to plug in on an as-needed basis.  </p>
<p>We having paying customers already, a version 1 of the SaaS, and have bootstrapped it ourselves and with friends and family money.  We&#8217;re looking for 250K to scale market adoption (we can do that in 4 to 6 months) to get the momentum we need to go for a bigger multimillion raise to grow the bejesus out of this thing.</p>
<p>Rock the Deadline Studios is the key to scaling quality content marketing and the answer B2B marketers have been looking for.  </p>
<p>P.S.  Mention this &#8220;content marketing&#8221; ad and get 20% off your first order <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ))<br />
__________________</p>
<p>Does this make it clearer or muddier?  Any advice on  a different angle or approach that would be better understood by someone who isn&#8217;t in the deep in the world of marketing would be much appreciated.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NYC Pioneers: Cyrus Massoumi and ZocDoc by This blog&#8217;s first year &#171; Startup Harbor</title>
		<link>http://startupharbor.me/2012/07/22/nyc-pioneers-cyrus-massoumi-zocdoc/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This blog&#8217;s first year &#171; Startup Harbor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupharbor.me/?p=231#comment-399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Lawyered: Talking to Bo Yaghmaie (197/2%), followed by Venture Capital for Dummies (192/2%) and NYC Pioneers: Cyrus Massoumi and ZocDoc (187/2%). My biggest referrals came from Business Insider (1,523/17%), Hacker News (1,370/15%), [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lawyered: Talking to Bo Yaghmaie (197/2%), followed by Venture Capital for Dummies (192/2%) and NYC Pioneers: Cyrus Massoumi and ZocDoc (187/2%). My biggest referrals came from Business Insider (1,523/17%), Hacker News (1,370/15%), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Venture Capital for Dummies by This blog&#8217;s first year &#171; Startup Harbor</title>
		<link>http://startupharbor.me/2012/09/12/venture-capital-for-dummies/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This blog&#8217;s first year &#171; Startup Harbor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupharbor.me/?p=256#comment-398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Chris Yeh (1,857 + tons to homepage/21%+), Lawyered: Talking to Bo Yaghmaie (197/2%), followed by Venture Capital for Dummies (192/2%) and NYC Pioneers: Cyrus Massoumi and ZocDoc (187/2%). My biggest referrals came from [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Yeh (1,857 + tons to homepage/21%+), Lawyered: Talking to Bo Yaghmaie (197/2%), followed by Venture Capital for Dummies (192/2%) and NYC Pioneers: Cyrus Massoumi and ZocDoc (187/2%). My biggest referrals came from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lawyered: Talking to Bo Yaghmaie by This blog&#8217;s first year &#171; Startup Harbor</title>
		<link>http://startupharbor.me/2012/05/13/lawyered-talking-to-bo-yaghmaie/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This blog&#8217;s first year &#171; Startup Harbor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupharbor.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] total site views), On Venture Capital and other stuff: Chris Yeh (1,857 + tons to homepage/21%+), Lawyered: Talking to Bo Yaghmaie (197/2%), followed by Venture Capital for Dummies (192/2%) and NYC Pioneers: Cyrus Massoumi and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] total site views), On Venture Capital and other stuff: Chris Yeh (1,857 + tons to homepage/21%+), Lawyered: Talking to Bo Yaghmaie (197/2%), followed by Venture Capital for Dummies (192/2%) and NYC Pioneers: Cyrus Massoumi and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Venture Capital and other stuff: Chris Yeh by This blog&#8217;s first year &#171; Startup Harbor</title>
		<link>http://startupharbor.me/2012/04/29/83/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This blog&#8217;s first year &#171; Startup Harbor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupharbor.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] most visited posts are Tagstand and the NFC Revolution (2,204 views/24% of total site views), On Venture Capital and other stuff: Chris Yeh (1,857 + tons to homepage/21%+), Lawyered: Talking to Bo Yaghmaie (197/2%), followed by Venture [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most visited posts are Tagstand and the NFC Revolution (2,204 views/24% of total site views), On Venture Capital and other stuff: Chris Yeh (1,857 + tons to homepage/21%+), Lawyered: Talking to Bo Yaghmaie (197/2%), followed by Venture [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
